 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leo Babauta: Zen to Done: The Growing Life E-Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.projectmojave.com/blog/leo-babauta-zen-to-done-the-growing-life-e-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.projectmojave.com/blog/leo-babauta-zen-to-done-the-growing-life-e-book-review/</link>
	<description>Create a Freedom Business in 3 Months</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.projectmojave.com/blog/leo-babauta-zen-to-done-the-growing-life-e-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://TheGrowingLife.com/2008/02/leo-babauta-zen-to-done-the-growing-life-e-book-review/#comment-5282</guid>
		<description>This really doesn&#039;t tell me much about the book.
What is DIFFERENT about the book.
Does it actually present a new system or new principles.
From reading your review, it sounds like the author is basically setting out his insights in using the other two systems, and calling it his own system. But perhaps that&#039;s what it is. Considering it&#039;s advertised all over the place, if that&#039;s the case I&#039;m not so impressed.
Actually, I also read your review of another book on here.
I thin you need to pick up the NYT ROB and have a read of a few reviews.
I almost suspect that your reviews are just a way to do favours for your advertisers by bringing people to the page ~ because they are just that flimsy. Sorry, but that&#039;s the impression I get.
A review is supposed to outline what&#039;s in the book in a THOROUGH way, say what you like and didn&#039;t AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, advise whether the book is worth getting - and why and for whom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really doesn&#8217;t tell me much about the book.<br />
What is DIFFERENT about the book.<br />
Does it actually present a new system or new principles.<br />
From reading your review, it sounds like the author is basically setting out his insights in using the other two systems, and calling it his own system. But perhaps that&#8217;s what it is. Considering it&#8217;s advertised all over the place, if that&#8217;s the case I&#8217;m not so impressed.<br />
Actually, I also read your review of another book on here.<br />
I thin you need to pick up the NYT ROB and have a read of a few reviews.<br />
I almost suspect that your reviews are just a way to do favours for your advertisers by bringing people to the page ~ because they are just that flimsy. Sorry, but that&#8217;s the impression I get.<br />
A review is supposed to outline what&#8217;s in the book in a THOROUGH way, say what you like and didn&#8217;t AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, advise whether the book is worth getting &#8211; and why and for whom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.projectmojave.com @ 2010-09-10 05:57:16 -->